![]() Mentioned in passing : P.69 : speech-to-text typewriter (yes). (Yes, but I missed the 3-D printer aboard the space-ship/ISS). prediction : upload parts needed (SW/HW) to a space-ship enroute. predictions : automated wide-spectrum diagnoses of failures in technical devices (no, but many narrow-spectrum sensor based systems). ![]() prediction : automated wide-spectrum diagnoses at every village doctors' practice (no, but many narrow-spectrum sensor based systems, leaving the doctor to do the deductions). prediction : automated investment advisor in every bank branch (no, no sign of that yet). Real-time arbitrary scene analysis not yet feasible (in a military context partially yes, Intelligent Robots not here yet (but autonomous cars expected next year). Automated knowledge acquisition not expected to be achieved (still not here yet). No, we use Wikipedia to look up human-written texts instead). ![]() Intelligent teaching systems based on the explanation component of expert systems ( predictions : Knowledge based expert systems (yes, but far fewer than I had hoped for). Reality with what I predicted 30 years ago. So I have the retrospective opportunity to compare today's Now here we are, 30 years on, and I found the stenographers' transcription in my bookshelves. Given such a doughty and illustrious co-lecturer, I decided to play it low-key - no hype - only what I thought (in 1985) were realistic expectations. Short notice - and with NO briefing - I got to take his place. Turns out that Siekmann got stuck in Madrid, so at Hoimar von Ditfurth, so a right-royal academic battle was expected. Simply because no-one ever wrote down what we said thirty years ago! Turns out, I was an exception here's the anecdote, from an AI lecture of mine.īack in 1985, a discussion panel had been set up, aiming to educate government personnel, top civil servants, top industrial managers, press et alĪbout what might be expected of Artificial Intelligence. I say no sooth Very few of us ever get the chance of an objective assessment of our abilities as an oracle, predicting the future. So I'll bring one monday which is even acceptable to Gerald, OK? X E (USA) and half a dozen others want a (simple) explanation of the Airbus accident. I see you are based in Worpswede I'm envious! ![]() You may find MathJax quite useful." Thanks for the heads-up on MathJax :-) ![]() So I wanted to take this opportunity to say: Thank you for your blog!" De nada now I am combing the honey from out of my beard, as we say here :-) Gerald (D) sent a thankyou-note, but in German, so Google translates "Īnd it was a pleasure not to find there today speculation on the aircraft accident, although you have more aeronautical competence than most of the reporting journalists. #IFART ADDS THE FAREWELL CODE#I've linked it as a jpg so that readers see the source code rather than the rendering (which is correct). The rest is up to you (or your readers)" OK, thanks. I was trying to avoid learning yet another markup language, it's easier just to blog without using formulae.Īttached html displays the left side of your equation with the help of mathml. HTML 5 standard (but HTML 5 is probably too crazy and nested to write a complete page with rendering and layout definitionsĬompletely by hand without the help of a framework or IDE). You have until the end of the month to get the HTML right -)īut remember, there's more to life than just maths -)Ĭould take a look at MathML, a mark-up language for mathematical formulars supported in most browsers as part of the ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |